Lender’s Duties When Selling A Repossessed Property


The number of repossession claims has dropped drastically over recent years. According to Government statistics, at its peak in 1991 as many as 75,500 properties were repossessed and 0.77% of all recorded mortgages in arrears. Whilst this dropped to 33,900 (0.30% of all recorded mortgages) in 2012, and is set to continue on this trend, recent case law has given a timely reminder of the duties a mortgagee in possession has in relation to obtaining the best price reasonably obtainable for a property when selling on.

Lenders should note the case of Meah –v- GE Money Home Finance Limited [2013] EWCH 20. Whilst the borrower’s claim was ultimately unsuccessful, the case encourages lenders to take care and adopt best practice when selling as mortgagee in possession. The key points to come out of the case were:

– The mortgagor is owed a specific duty that reasonable care will be taken to obtain the best price reasonably available at the time;

– Lenders should always obtain professional advice from surveyors both on value and method of sale; and

– Even if the asking price is not achieved, mortgagees in possession need to be able to robustly demonstrate that the property has been sufficiently exposed to the market.

The case concludes that if these factors are considered and followed, then any claim brought by a disgruntled borrower is likely to fail.

The Financial Ombudsman Service assesses complaints from borrowers claiming that repossessed property has been sold effectively at an undervalue. The Ombudsman will consider what steps were taken by the mortgagee in possession to get the best price it could at the time, for example, that:

  • it obtained proper valuations of the property before marketing it;
  • there was no unreasonable administrative delay on its part;
  • it kept the consumer informed about what would happen – and responded to questions in a sensitive and timely way;
  • it took reasonable steps to arrange for removal by the consumer of any personal items left at the property;
  • it took reasonable steps to keep the property safe – and to avoid unnecessary deterioration of the property during the time it was in possession of it;
  • the property was actively marketed through appropriate agents to obtain the best price;
  • auction was only considered if more traditional approaches to marketing had failed to attract a buyer; and
  • costs passed on to the borrower were for necessary work, were reasonable, and could be backed up with estimates and invoices.

Some of the sanctions dealt out to lenders when they have failed to comply with these steps, include:

  • a refund of costs (or partial costs);
  • a refund of interest;
  • compensation for distress and inconvenience caused

It is important that lenders are aware of what is expected by the courts and the Financial Ombudsman Service, and indeed what the consequences of not following these steps are. The repossession of a property rarely results in the satisfaction of those concerned. Ensuring compliance with these simple steps will at least help to avoid further unnecessary cost and inconvenience for lenders.

Greenhalgh Kerr
Olympic House, Beecham Court,
Smithy Brook Rd,
Wigan WN3 6PR

View on google maps

+44 (0)333 200 5200

We are confident in our work and we know that recoveries is a key part of a lender or creditor’s business

We are confident in our work and we know that recoveries is a key part of a lender or creditor’s business. We have designed our pilot projects to give lenders and creditors the comfort and confidence in our service before formally and fully switching recoveries providers. This time also allows new clients to benchmark our service levers and results against existing providers and others.

How it works


You choose 10 recoveries cases

You choose 10 recoveries cases to get us started. We’ll deliver our usual onboarding protocol where we’ll get to know you and your systems, culture, methods, preferences, and requirements.


We get started

We assess each case by setting a strategy then grading and reporting on the case in terms of prospects and timescales and cost. We make immediate contact with debtors, and pursue a recovery in our tried and tested ways.


We review

We deliver ongoing, structured, tailored reports as per your needs and carry out a full 3-month review on these 20 cases. There we’ll discuss how we have worked together, patterns we have seen in your borrowers, your systems, your documents, your pre-legal conduct, outcomes, highs and lows, legal costs (and costs borne by debtors), and possible improvements in all of these.


No strings

We carry on working in this way until all cases have been concluded. You are then free to carry on your discussions with us or to use the experience and market intelligence gained by working with us in the future.

Lenders and creditors have nothing to lose, and everything to gain, by engaging with us on a pilot project.